The Drum Awards Festival - Extended Deadline

-d -h -min -sec

US Presidential Election Media Donald Trump

Donald Trump threatens to sue The New York Times, their lawyer fights back


By Haley Velasco, Freelance journalist

October 13, 2016 | 4 min read

In the midst of one of the most inflammatory US elections in history, Donald Trump’s sordid past is coming back to haunt him … once again.

Recently, it was the video released by the Washington Post which showed Trump and suspended host Billy Bush saying crude things about women in 2005.

On the heels of the second presidential debate where Trump emphatically denied assaulting women, by saying “No, I have not," The New York Times has published the stories of two women — Jessica Leeds and Rachel Crook — who he has reportedly assaulted.

In the effort to tell their stories, through details such as, “He was like an octopus” and “His hands were everywhere” and “It was an assault,” according to Leeds, The Times exposed two more accounts of questionable behavior.

As retaliation, the Trump camp sent The New York Times a letter demanding for a retraction of the story, "Two Women Say Donald Trump Touched Them Inappropriately".

New York Times VP and Assistant General Counsel David McCraw responded to Trump with a letter that contained the following:

Dear Mr. Kasowitz:

I write in response to your letter of October 12, 2016 to Dean Baquet concerning your client Donald Trump, the Republican Party nominee for President of the United States. You write concerning our article "Two Women Say Donald Trump Touched Them Inappropriately" and label the article as "libel per se." You ask that we "remove it from [our] website, and issue a full and immediate retraction and apology." We decline to do so.

The essence of a libel claim, of course, is the protection of one's reputation. Mr. Trump has bragged about his non-consensual sexual touching of women. He has bragged about intruding on beauty pageant contestants in their dressing rooms. He acquiesced to a radio host's request to discuss Mr. Trump's own daughter as a "piece of ass." Multiple women not mentioned in our article have publicly come forward to report on Mr. Trump's unwanted advances. Nothing in our article has had the slightest effect on the reputation that Mr. Trump, through his own words and actions, has already created for himself.

But there is a larger and much more important point here. The women quoted in our story spoke out on an issue of national importance - indeed, an issue that Mr. Trump himself discussed with the whole nation watching during Sunday night's presidential debate. Our reporters diligently worked to confirm the women's accounts. They provided readers with Mr. Trump's response, including his forceful denial of the women's reports. It would have been a disservice not just to our readers but to democracy itself to silence their voices. We did what the law allows: We published newsworthy information about a subject of deep public concern. If Mr. Trump disagrees, if he believes that American citizens had no right to hear what these women had to say and that the law of this country forces us and those who would dare to criticize him to stand silent or be punished, we welcome the opportunity to have a court set him straight.


David E. McGraw

US Presidential Election Media Donald Trump

More from US Presidential Election

View all


Industry insights

View all
Add your own content +