9 January 2013 - 8:52am | posted by | 2 comments

Naked Kate Winslet photo ban branded a ‘worrying precedent’

Naked Kate Winslet photo ban branded a ‘worrying precedent’Naked Kate Winslet photo ban branded a ‘worrying precedent’

A High Court judge’s decision to ban dissemination of a photo of Kate Winslet’s husband, freely circulated on the web for over two years, has been branded as a ‘worrying precedent’ by free speech campaigners.

Justice Briggs made the decree after deciding that publication of the semi-naked image would breach the family’s privacy and lead to their children being bullied.

RocknRoll, the 34 year old nephew of Sir Richard Branson who changed his name from Edward Abel Smith, sought the injunction after the Sun newspaper attempted to print the image.

He won despite the offending image having been freely available on a friends Facebook page – which had no privacy settings, but have since been removed.

Niri Shan, head of media law at Taylor Wessing, said: “It is the first time that a Facebook page without any privacy settings has been subject of a successful injunction," he said. “It is surprising that the fact it had been available on a public page for more than two years and could be seen by his 1,500 friends did not carry more weight.

“It is a worrying precedent for the media because Facebook is a big source of information for them."

Don't miss out... Get your Marketing news by email

Comments

9 Jan 2013 - 10:38
colingoto
1
comments

They will have us all in Burka`s next.

0
1
9 Jan 2013 - 13:33
saman_mansourpour's picture
12
comments

So in leu of the Prince Harry photo's are The Drum intending to publish these?

0
0

Write Your Comment

New to The Drum

You will be sent a verification email. Click on the link in the email to post your comment.

Directory Latest