2 November 2012 - 10:39am | posted by | 1 comment

The Leith Agency creative director Gerry Farrell attacks poisonous ‘Incredinburgh’ criticism

The Leith Agency creative director Gerry Farrell attacks poisonous ‘Incredinburgh’ criticismThe Leith Agency creative director Gerry Farrell attacks poisonous

Gerry Farrell, creative director of the Leith Agency, has branded Edinburgh City Council’s deputy leader as ‘poisonous’ following criticism of the agency’s ‘Incredinburgh’ marketing campaign.

It follows calls by Steve Cardownie to ditch several slogans from the £300k marketing push, presaging a war of words between the pair.

Cardownie has hit back at what he calls ‘gratuitous personal insults’ and ‘unprofessional’ conduct following a string of comments posted on Farrell’s Twitter account.

These labelled Cardownie as ‘King Cobra’, ‘Leaker-in-Chief Steve Carbattery’, ‘Steve Carbootsale’ and ‘Hissing Steve’ following allegations that he had leaked details of the campaign weeks before it was due to be publically unveiled.

But Cardownie responded: “It is disappointing Gerry Farrell should descend into gratuitous personal insults like this. He should have broad enough shoulders to take the criticism.

“I was only critical of this particular campaign. I have actually lauded the Leith Agency over their other campaigns, but I just didn’t like this campaign when it was presented to us.”

“I’d have thought it would not be very good for his business that he cannot take legitimate criticism and resorts to a tirade of personal abuse. I think I’m entitled to have an opinion on it.”
The campaign is being funded by Marketing Edinburgh which receives funding from Edinburgh City Council.

Gerry Farrell declined to comment further when contacted by The Drum.

Don't miss out... Get your Advertising news by email

See all specialist newsletters

6 related companies from Profile Hub:

Comments

2 Nov 2012 - 19:08
airdmckinstrie's picture

Mr Cardownie may not have liked the campaign personally but as an office holder of the commissioning body can he not see that his comments erode the value of the public investment? He, like any public employee is entitled to his opinion. It is questionable whether he is entitled to voice it in a public forum.

3
0

Please sign in or register to comment on this article.

Latest Projects from the Profile Hub

Case Study | RLH

01/09/2014
Chris Ross, MD of full-service B2B advertising agency RLH,...

Brand new logo design for The Scottish Graduate School for Arts and Humanities

29/08/2014
The Scottish Graduate School for Arts and Humanities (SGSAH...

DrupalCon 2014

27/08/2014
We were selected by the Drupal Association through a...

New Forest National Park - Young David Attenborough discovers the Tech Creche

21/08/2014
Research conducted by the New Forest National Park...

Social Media Training

18/08/2014
We love to share what we know and what we've learned about...