24 March 2012 - 11:27am | posted by | 0 comments

Price comparison websites face regulation call

Price comparison websites face regulation callPrice comparison websites face regulation call

Consumer association Which? Has called for regulation of price comparison websites after finding that some were giving out misleading advice on insurance policies.

This was achieved by pre-selecting certain options to make initial prices appear artificially cheap, causing some customers to spend more than was necessary

Which? Editor Martyn Hocking said: “We do not think they are always fair, or very clear. Our research shows you will often get very cheap looking quotes from a price comparison website. When you click through to buy the insurance, you will get a far higher price from the insurer.

“They will assume that your car is always parked on the drive or in a locked garage. If you park on the street, when you go to click through to the insurer you will get a far higher quote than you would have done on that comparison website.”

Clare Francis, head of content at one such site, Moneysupermarket.com, defended their record however, saying: “Last year we saved our customers £800m, so there is clearly a lot of people out there who really value the benefit of using a price comparison site to find the best deal for them," she said, stressing that the website was free to use.”

Be the first to comment on this article: sign in or register.

Latest Projects from the Profile Hub

Malibu - creating the perfect brand moment to enhance engagement

17/12/2014
The challenge How do you change customers’ perception of...

Driving Sales From Social During Black Friday

16/12/2014
The craze of Black Friday crossed the pond and hit the UK...

BREACH: LETS JACK

16/12/2014
‘Jack’ – the infectious track by British producer Breach...

Launching the Seasonal Cities App

15/12/2014
In Q3 2014 Rooster was tasked with launching the new travel...

Helping a new fitness brand get into shape

12/12/2014
A new concept in gym fitness is being developed and we’re...