2 February 2012 - 9:39am | posted by | 1 comment

Study indicates just one in three tweets are worth reading

Twitter users overwhelmed by hundreds of spam tweets can now quantify the problem thanks to an academic study of the platform conducted by researchers at Carnegie Mellon, MIT and Georgia Tech.

The team published a website, ‘who gives a tweet?’ that acted as a portal for people to anonymously rate the perceived quality of the tweets of those they follow in return for results feedback.

In total some 43,738 tweets were rated from over 2,000 unique accounts with 36% rated positively, 25% rated negatively and a further 39% as neutral.

Michael Bernstein, a doctoral student at MIT, explained: “A well-received tweet is not all that common. A significant amount of content is considered not worth reading, for a variety of reasons.”

These include tweets that comprise part of a semi-private conversation, old links or simply relate the current mood or activity of the tweeter.

Positive tweets included sharing of breaking news, self-promotion, opinions and engaging with followers by asking questions.

Comments

2 Feb 2012 - 15:18
noel_young's picture

A positive rating for as many as one in three? I AM surprised

0
0

Please sign in or register to comment on this article.

Latest Projects from the Profile Hub

Viviscal

27/03/2015
Our Challenge Lifes2Good is an expanding nutraceutical...

McGraw-Hill Education

27/03/2015
McGraw-Hill Education, the learning science company...

Sony Pictures

26/03/2015
Papa John's teamed up with Sony Pictures for the release of...

Case Study | Bladonmore

24/03/2015
David Ladds, Director of Bladonmore, share his insights in...

Jessica Tappin is pure gold for our client Freya Active

24/03/2015
To launch the Freya Active AW15 collection we created the ‘...