2 February 2012 - 9:39am | posted by | 1 comment

Study indicates just one in three tweets are worth reading

Twitter users overwhelmed by hundreds of spam tweets can now quantify the problem thanks to an academic study of the platform conducted by researchers at Carnegie Mellon, MIT and Georgia Tech.

The team published a website, ‘who gives a tweet?’ that acted as a portal for people to anonymously rate the perceived quality of the tweets of those they follow in return for results feedback.

In total some 43,738 tweets were rated from over 2,000 unique accounts with 36% rated positively, 25% rated negatively and a further 39% as neutral.

Michael Bernstein, a doctoral student at MIT, explained: “A well-received tweet is not all that common. A significant amount of content is considered not worth reading, for a variety of reasons.”

These include tweets that comprise part of a semi-private conversation, old links or simply relate the current mood or activity of the tweeter.

Positive tweets included sharing of breaking news, self-promotion, opinions and engaging with followers by asking questions.

Don't miss out... Get your Social Media news by email

See all specialist newsletters

20 related companies from Profile Hub, The Drum's modern marketing directory:

Comments

2 Feb 2012 - 15:18
noel_young's picture

A positive rating for as many as one in three? I AM surprised

0
0

Please sign in or register to comment on this article.

Latest Projects from the Profile Hub

BWP gets colourful with K3

18/09/2014
K3 approached BWP Group to help them design and build a...

dlc - Responsive website

17/09/2014
dlc is the UK’s leading, independent debt recovery firm,...

Ecommerce Solution for B2B and B2C Retailer

16/09/2014
Talking Tables provides high quality party decorations for...

Peak Scientific Innovation - Brand Communications for US Market

16/09/2014
Peak Scientific is a leading Scottish gas generator...

Messages in the Deep

16/09/2014
“Messages in the Deep” tells the remarkable tale of the...