13 October 2011 - 5:23pm | posted by | 0 comments

Flesh-baring marketing stunts at London 2012 could get you fined £20,000

Flesh-baring marketing stunts at London 2012 could get you fined £20,000Flesh-baring marketing stunts at London 2012 could get you fined £20

Revised legislation has been issued this week stating that exhibitionists baring their flesh for marketing stunts in and around 2012 Olympic venues could face criminal charges and fines of up to £20,000 in the magistrates court.

CEOs, marketing directors and other senior staff of brands appearing in "ambush marketing" in the vicinity of Olympic venues will be presumed guilty unless they can prove their innocence by proving that they had no knowledge of the activity or that they took reasonable steps to prevent it happening.

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) noted the risk of human bodies being used for ambush advertising following concerns raised in a recent consultation process. It has promised to "make additional changes to prohibit advertising on the human body". It says the legislation is "reasonable and proportionate", and that the matters a person is required to prove in their defence are "entirely within their knowledge".

However, advertising lawyer Nick Johnson, a London partner at international law firm Osborne Clarke, said: "This part of the Regulations is bad law. Exactly how is a CEO, a marketing director or a legal director supposed to prove they had no knowledge at all of an infringing act featuring their brand?

“"Mostly, this is robust but balanced legislation. It shuts the door on lots of ambush marketing techniques we've seen in the past: Betfair's birds of prey at the Ryder Cup, Gail Porter on the Houses of Parliament, Linford Christie's Puma contact lenses - all these would be caught under the tough provisions of this new law. But the provisions targeting senior businessmen and women within brands will serve only to spawn a small industry around written anti-ambush policies.

“Just as every business now has an anti-bribery policy, so board directors wishing to avoid personal liability for infringements by overenthusiastic marketers and agencies will have to implement written policies to help show they have taken all reasonable steps to avoid a breach. This is the kind of unnecessary red tape we could all do without."

Be the first to comment on this article: sign in or register.

Latest Projects from the Profile Hub

Reed Learning Personalisation with Sitecore

30/10/2014
Reed Learning, a leading provider of training courses and ...

First-time cruisers? It soon becomes a long-term love-in…

29/10/2014
Since July 2013, Cruise Nation and Rooster PR have been on...

Brand Campaign for 123RF

28/10/2014
The Challenge Help 123RF stand out against big-name image...

The Co-operative Bank - Loans Tool

27/10/2014
The digital strategy required a range of sticky tools and...

Check out Modalu's First Instagram Lookbook for #MeAndMyErin

27/10/2014
To celebrate the launch of Modalu's Erin Tote, Cult LDN...