19 March 2010 - 12:19pm | posted by | 8 comments

Leader: Don’t just talk to yourself, talk to your peers instead

Leader: Don’t just talk to yourself, talk to your peers insteadLeader: Don’t just talk to yourself, talk to your peers instead

The leader column from this week's issue of The Drum tackles the ongoing anonymous comments debate. Changes are afoot...

Well, that is what some would have you believe about those who use the Anonymous button on The Drum’s website.

Introduced a year ago it has proved popular and controversial in equal measure. In fact around 1,800 people have left 11,000 comments – 64% of which are anonymous – since comments were first accepted.

Most people hide their identity for legitimate reasons; wanting to offer insights and opinions without prejudicing future new business or employment opportunities.

However, others abuse the function by using it to settle scores.

The issue has come to a head recently. As the overall number of comments on the site reaches record levels, the number of comments which breach our terms and conditions has also risen.

Two agency MDs, Tony Stanton and Julian Kynaston, were prompted to speak out about the issue recently in their Drum Blogs. Kynaston went as far as calling his press release team out on strike as far as The Drum is concerned; which, depending on your point of view, might be deemed more of a promise than a threat.

But there is no doubt the men have the moral authority to speak out. Neither use the anonymous button themselves.

This is in contrast to one individual who contacted us on the back of Kynaston’s stance. He seemed very surprised we knew that he regularly used the anonymous option himself (see Last Word).

What he did not realise is that, although the anonymous button means we cannot – under the terms of our own journalistic code, and the Data Protection Act – release the identity of commentators to a third party without their permission, The Drum, if needs must, can identify them. This is essential in order to enforce our own Terms and Conditions.

A favourite form of abusing the anonymous button is to use it to add multiple comments to a story to create the impression it is more controversial than it is in reality. Last week for example, one individual commented on a single story 10 times. In fact, he even started taking issues with his own comments to create the impression he was 10 different people.

So with this in mind The Drum is to make some changes to its website very soon. We are going to be more stringent in enforcing our terms and conditions and those wanting to participate should read them carefully. We will also be replacing the anonymous button with the option for commentators to use a pseudonym.

Hopefully this will ensure sanity prevails in our online comments, and those wanting to talk to themselves go elsewhere.

Comments

Anonymous (not verified)
19 Mar 2010 - 14:49
Anonymous's picture

'Post Anonymously', 'Use a Pseudonym'... same thing.

Regards anonymously,

F Orum-Poster - oh *$!@

0
0
19 Mar 2010 - 14:54
graeme_longstaff's picture
268
comments

"Last week for example, one individual commented on a single story 10 times. In fact, he even started taking issues with his own comments to create the impression he was 10 different people."

Was it the thread on the new alzheimers campaign?

0
0
Anonymous (not verified)
19 Mar 2010 - 14:58
Anonymous's picture

I totally agree with the above but I think your 'coward' label is unfair. Can't you just delete the idiot comments and leave the 'constructive' anonymous ones. I still maintain that being anonymous makes everybody equal.

0
0
19 Mar 2010 - 15:58
will_atkinson's picture
130
comments

Hang on, the 'idiot' comments are half the fun. Keep 'em in. All those in favour say AYE!!!! Anonymously of course.

0
0
Anonymous (not verified)
19 Mar 2010 - 17:34
Anonymous's picture

Aye to keeping the idiots.

A N Idiot

0
0
Anonymous (not verified)
19 Mar 2010 - 21:07
Anonymous's picture

Aye!!

0
0
24 Mar 2010 - 00:11
tom_wray's picture
1
comments

Dear The Drum. Would you consider seperating your website into two? One half being for those of us who want to read about design work and industry related developments, provided with; - no log in facility - no visibility of articles in any way connected to the subject of your blog or anon debate. - nothing to do with the views of people who have got the time to waste writing articles about said blog and anon debate. You could then charge an additional subscription fee to those who want to be involved in this debate (or indeed your blog) and use the funds raised to allow you to afford a subscription reduction for those who just want to read their industry press without having to wade through this type of, frankly mind numbing, stuff.

Don't get me wrong I have used this blog a few times before but I would happily forfeit blog access if it meant I never had to see another article about the anon debate and what certain people think of it ever again.

0
0
25 Mar 2010 - 21:57
ben_swift's picture
18
comments

Hurrah! The Drum went for the pseudonym thing. It may be the only suggestion I ever make that gets taken seriously. I may have a celebratory G&T. MAN I'm rock n' roll.

Fair point in way Tom, but, be fair, the comment/blog bitch-fests are pretty bloody funny sometimes. And anyway, who wants an industry press that's just made up of press releases and opinion pieces by those who've paid to be on the panel?

Especially as the comments quite often reveal a bit more about a particular topic than the air-brushed PR-department-approved article generally allow...

0
0

Write Your Comment

New to The Drum

You will be sent a verification email. Click on the link in the email to post your comment.

Directory Latest